Category Archives: Psycho-physiological Bases Of Engineering

A summary of the Clarion cognitive architecture

June 27, 2017 11:07 ,

Ron Sun, Anatomy of the Mind: a Quick Overview, Cognitive Computation, February 2017, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–4, DOI: 10.1007/s12559-016-9444-2.

The recently published book, “Anatomy of the Mind,” explains psychological (cognitive) mechanisms, processes, and functionalities through a comprehensive computational theory of the human mind—that is, a cognitive architecture. The goal of the work has been to develop a unified framework and then to develop process-based mechanistic understanding of psychological phenomena within the unified framework. In this article, I will provide a quick overview of the work.

Posted in: Cognitive sciences, Psycho-physiological bases of engineering , Tagged: ,

Approach to explain gaze: gaze is directed to task- and goal-relevant scene regions

June 21, 2017 12:12 ,

John M. Henderson, Gaze Control as Prediction, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 21, Issue 1, January 2017, Pages 15-23, ISSN 1364-6613, DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.003.

The recent study of overt attention during complex scene viewing has emphasized explaining gaze behavior in terms of image properties and image salience independently of the viewer’s intentions and understanding of the scene. In this Opinion article, I outline an alternative approach proposing that gaze control in natural scenes can be characterized as the result of knowledge-driven prediction. This view provides a theoretical context for integrating and unifying many of the disparate phenomena observed in active scene viewing, offers the potential for integrating the behavioral study of gaze with the neurobiological study of eye movements, and provides a theoretical framework for bridging gaze control and other related areas of perception and cognition at both computational and neurobiological levels of analysis.

Posted in: Psycho-physiological bases of engineering , Tagged:

Demonstration that a theory of cortical function (“predictive coding”) can perform bayesian inference in some tasks, with a nice related work of physiological foundations of probability distribution representation in neurons and of bayesian inference

June 21, 2017 11:57 ,

M. W. Spratling, A neural implementation of Bayesian inference based on predictive coding, Connection Science, Volume 28, 2016 – Issue 4, DOI: 10.1080/09540091.2016.1243655.

Predictive coding (PC) is a leading theory of cortical function that has previously been shown to explain a great deal of neurophysiological and psychophysical data. Here it is shown that PC can perform almost exact Bayesian inference when applied to computing with population codes. It is demonstrated that the proposed algorithm, based on PC, can: decode probability distributions encoded as noisy population codes; combine priors with likelihoods to calculate posteriors; perform cue integration and cue segregation; perform function approximation; be extended to perform hierarchical inference; simultaneously represent and reason about multiple stimuli; and perform inference with multi-modal and non-Gaussian probability distributions. PC thus provides a neural network-based method for performing probabilistic computation and provides a simple, yet comprehensive, theory of how the cerebral cortex performs Bayesian inference.

Posted in: Psycho-physiological bases of engineering , Tagged:

Including selective attention and cortical magnification to improve computer vision

June 21, 2017 10:43 ,

Ala Aboudib, Vincent Gripon, Gilles Coppin, A Biologically Inspired Framework for Visual Information Processing and an Application on Modeling Bottom-Up Visual Attention, Cognitive Computation, December 2016, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 1007–1026, DOI: 10.1007/s12559-016-9430-8.

An emerging trend in visual information processing is toward incorporating some interesting properties of the ventral stream in order to account for some limitations of machine learning algorithms. Selective attention and cortical magnification are two such important phenomena that have been the subject of a large body of research in recent years. In this paper, we focus on designing a new model for visual acquisition that takes these important properties into account.We propose a new framework for visual information acquisition and representation that emulates the architecture of the primate visual system by integrating features such as retinal sampling and cortical magnification while avoiding spatial deformations and other side effects produced by models that tried to implement these two features. It also explicitly integrates the notion of visual angle, which is rarely taken into account by vision models. We argue that this framework can provide the infrastructure for implementing vision tasks such as object recognition and computational visual attention algorithms.To demonstrate the utility of the proposed vision framework, we propose an algorithm for bottom-up saliency prediction implemented using the proposed architecture. We evaluate the performance of the proposed model on the MIT saliency benchmark and show that it attains state-of-the-art performance, while providing some advantages over other models.

Posted in: Computer vision, Psycho-physiological bases of engineering , Tagged:

On the limitations of cognitive control from the human psychological perspective

June 20, 2017 12:44 ,

Tarek Amer, Karen L. Campbell, Lynn Hasher, Cognitive Control As a Double-Edged Sword, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 20, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 905-915, ISSN 1364-6613, DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.002.

Cognitive control, the ability to limit attention to goal-relevant information, aids performance on a wide range of laboratory tasks. However, there are many day-to-day functions which require little to no control and others which even benefit from reduced control. We review behavioral and neuroimaging evidence demonstrating that reduced control can enhance the performance of both older and, under some circumstances, younger adults. Using healthy aging as a model, we demonstrate that decreased cognitive control benefits performance on tasks ranging from acquiring and using environmental information to generating creative solutions to problems. Cognitive control is thus a double-edged sword – aiding performance on some tasks when fully engaged, and many others when less engaged.

Posted in: Psycho-physiological bases of engineering , Tagged:

A proposal that explains why the human brain seems bayesian but finds difficulties in using probabilities: because it uses sampling

June 20, 2017 11:26 ,

Adam N. Sanborn, Nick Chater, Bayesian Brains without Probabilities, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 20, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 883-893, ISSN 1364-6613, DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.003.

Bayesian explanations have swept through cognitive science over the past two decades, from intuitive physics and causal learning, to perception, motor control and language. Yet people flounder with even the simplest probability questions. What explains this apparent paradox? How can a supposedly Bayesian brain reason so poorly with probabilities? In this paper, we propose a direct and perhaps unexpected answer: that Bayesian brains need not represent or calculate probabilities at all and are, indeed, poorly adapted to do so. Instead, the brain is a Bayesian sampler. Only with infinite samples does a Bayesian sampler conform to the laws of probability; with finite samples it systematically generates classic probabilistic reasoning errors, including the unpacking effect, base-rate neglect, and the conjunction fallacy.

Posted in: Psycho-physiological bases of engineering , Tagged:

How hierarchical reinforcement learning resembles human creativity, i.e., matching the psychological aspects with the engineering ones

June 20, 2017 10:26 ,

Thomas R. Colin, Tony Belpaeme, Angelo Cangelosi, Nikolas Hemion, Hierarchical reinforcement learning as creative problem solving, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Volume 86, 2016, Pages 196-206, ISSN 0921-8890, DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.021.

Although creativity is studied from philosophy to cognitive robotics, a definition has proven elusive. We argue for emphasizing the creative process (the cognition of the creative agent), rather than the creative product (the artifact or behavior). Owing to developments in experimental psychology, the process approach has become an increasingly attractive way of characterizing creative problem solving. In particular, the phenomenon of insight, in which an individual arrives at a solution through a sudden change in perspective, is a crucial component of the process of creativity. These developments resonate with advances in machine learning, in particular hierarchical and modular approaches, as the field of artificial intelligence aims for general solutions to problems that typically rely on creativity in humans or other animals. We draw a parallel between the properties of insight according to psychology and the properties of Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (HRL) systems for embodied agents. Using the Creative Systems Framework developed by Wiggins and Ritchie, we analyze both insight and HRL, establishing that they are creative in similar ways. We highlight the key challenges to be met in order to call an artificial system “insightful”.

Posted in: Psycho-physiological bases of engineering , Tagged: ,

Survey of Cognitive Offloading

June 19, 2017 10:39 ,

Evan F. Risko, Sam J. Gilbert, Cognitive Offloading, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 20, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 676-688, ISSN 1364-6613, DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002.

If you have ever tilted your head to perceive a rotated image, or programmed a smartphone to remind you of an upcoming appointment, you have engaged in cognitive offloading: the use of physical action to alter the information processing requirements of a task so as to reduce cognitive demand. Despite the ubiquity of this type of behavior, it has only recently become the target of systematic investigation in and of itself. We review research from several domains that focuses on two main questions: (i) what mechanisms trigger cognitive offloading, and (ii) what are the cognitive consequences of this behavior? We offer a novel metacognitive framework that integrates results from diverse domains and suggests avenues for future research.

Posted in: Psycho-physiological bases of engineering , Tagged: ,

A nive review of reinforcement learning from the perspective of its physiological foundations and its application to Robotics

June 12, 2017 10:37 ,

Cornelius Weber, Mark Elshaw, Stefan Wermter, Jochen Triesch and Christopher Willmot, Reinforcement Learning Embedded in Brains and Robots, Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Applications, Book edited by Cornelius Weber, Mark Elshaw and Norbert Michael Mayer, ISBN 978-3-902613-14-1, pp.424, January 2008, I-Tech Education and Publishing, Vienna, Austria. (Local copy)

Posted in: Psycho-physiological bases of engineering , Tagged:

On how the calculus of utility of actions drives many human behaviours

June 8, 2017 12:11 ,

Julian Jara-Ettinger, Hyowon Gweon, Laura E. Schulz, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, The Naïve Utility Calculus: Computational Principles Underlying Commonsense Psychology, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 20, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 589-604, ISSN 1364-6613, DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.011.

We propose that human social cognition is structured around a basic understanding of ourselves and others as intuitive utility maximizers: from a young age, humans implicitly assume that agents choose goals and actions to maximize the rewards they expect to obtain relative to the costs they expect to incur. This \u2018naïve utility calculus\u2019 allows both children and adults observe the behavior of others and infer their beliefs and desires, their longer-term knowledge and preferences, and even their character: who is knowledgeable or competent, who is praiseworthy or blameworthy, who is friendly, indifferent, or an enemy. We review studies providing support for the naïve utility calculus, and we show how it captures much of the rich social reasoning humans engage in from infancy.

Posted in: Psycho-physiological bases of engineering , Tagged: