Tag Archives: Time In The Brain

Modelling the perception of time in the human brain through RL with eligibility traces

I. Louren�o, R. Mattila, R. Ventura and B. Wahlberg, A Biologically Inspired Computational Model of Time Perception, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 258-268, June 2022 DOI: 10.1109/TCDS.2021.3120301.

Time perception\u2014how humans and animals perceive the passage of time\u2014forms the basis for important cognitive skills, such as decision making, planning, and communication. In this work, we propose a framework for examining the mechanisms responsible for time perception. We first model neural time perception as a combination of two known timing sources: internal neuronal mechanisms and external (environmental) stimuli, and design a decision-making framework to replicate them. We then implement this framework in a simulated robot. We measure the robot\u2019s success on a temporal discrimination task originally performed by mice to evaluate their capacity to exploit temporal knowledge. We conclude that the robot is able to perceive time similarly to animals when it comes to their intrinsic mechanisms of interpreting time and performing time-aware actions. Next, by analyzing the behavior of agents equipped with the framework, we propose an estimator to infer characteristics of the timing mechanisms intrinsic to the agents. In particular, we show that from their empirical action probability distribution, we are able to estimate parameters used for perceiving time. Overall, our work shows promising results when it comes to drawing conclusions regarding some of the characteristics present in biological timing mechanisms.

NOTE: See also H. Basgol, I. Ayhan and E. Ugur, “Time Perception: A Review on Psychological, Computational, and Robotic Models,” in IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 301-315, June 2022, doi: 10.1109/TCDS.2021.3059045.

On how physical movements shape the perception of time

Rose De Kock, Keri Anne Gladhill, Minaz Numa Ali, Wilsaan Mychal Joiner, Martin Wiener, How movements shape the perception of time, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 25, Issue 11, 2021, Pages 950-963 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.08.002.

In order to keep up with a changing environment, mobile organisms must be capable of deciding both where and when to move. This precision necessitates a strong sense of time, as otherwise we would fail in many of our movement goals. Yet, despite this intrinsic link, only recently have researchers begun to understand how these two features interact. Primarily, two effects have been observed: movements can bias time estimates, but they can also make them more precise. Here we review this literature and propose that both effects can be explained by a Bayesian cue combination framework, in which movement itself affords the most precise representation of time, which can influence perception in either feedforward or active sensing modes.

A very interesting analysis on how reinforcement learning depends on time, both for MDPs and for the psychological basis of RL in the human brain

Elijah A. Petter, Samuel J. Gershman, Warren H. Meck, Integrating Models of Interval Timing and Reinforcement Learning, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 22, Issue 10, 2018, Pages 911-922 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.004.

We present an integrated view of interval timing and reinforcement learning (RL) in the brain. The computational goal of RL is to maximize future rewards, and this depends crucially on a representation of time. Different RL systems in the brain process time in distinct ways. A model-based system learns ‘what happens when’, employing this internal model to generate action plans, while a model-free system learns to predict reward directly from a set of temporal basis functions. We describe how these systems are subserved by a computational division of labor between several brain regions, with a focus on the basal ganglia and the hippocampus, as well as how these regions are influenced by the neuromodulator dopamine.

Some quotes beyond the abstract:

The Markov assumption also makes explicit the requirements for temporal representation. All temporal dynamics must be captured by the state-transition function, which means that the state representation must encode the time-invariant structure of the environment.