Monthly Archives: January 2026

You are browsing the site archives by month.

Uncovering time variations in decision making of agents that do not always respond with the same policy

Anne E. Urai, Structure uncovered: understanding temporal variability in perceptual decision-making, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 30, Issue 1, 2026, Pages 54-65 10.1016/j.tics.2025.06.003.

Studies of perceptual decision-making typically present the same stimulus repeatedly over the course of an experimental session but ignore the order of these observations, assuming unrealistic stability of decision strategies over trials. However, even ‘stable,’ ‘steady-state,’ or ‘expert’ decision-making behavior features significant trial-to-trial variability that is richly structured in time. Structured trial-to-trial variability of various forms can be uncovered using latent variable models such as hidden Markov models and autoregressive models, revealing how unobservable internal states change over time. Capturing such temporal structure can avoid confounds in cognitive models, provide insights into inter- and intraindividual variability, and bridge the gap between neural and cognitive mechanisms of variability in perceptual decision-making.

See also: the no so strong influence of time in some cognitive processes, such as speech processing (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.05.017)

Evidences in the natural world of the benefits of communication errors within collaborative agents

Bradley D. Ohlinger, Takao Sasaki, How miscommunication can improve collective performance in social insects, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 30, Issue 1, 2026, Pages 10-12, 10.1016/j.tics.2025.10.005.

Communication errors are typically viewed as detrimental, yet they can benefit collective foraging in social insects. Temnothorax ants provide a powerful model for studying how such errors arise during tandem running and how they might improve group performance under certain environmental conditions.