Category Archives: Applications Of Reinforcement Learning To Robots

Using physical human-robot interaction to deduce the goals of the human during learning

September 29, 2023 15:31 ,

Losey DP, Bajcsy A, O’Malley MK, Dragan AD, Physical interaction as communication: Learning robot objectives online from human corrections, The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2022;41(1):20-44 DOI: 10.1177/02783649211050958.

When a robot performs a task next to a human, physical interaction is inevitable: the human might push, pull, twist, or guide the robot. The state of the art treats these interactions as disturbances that the robot should reject or avoid. At best, these robots respond safely while the human interacts; but after the human lets go, these robots simply return to their original behavior. We recognize that physical human\u2013robot interaction (pHRI) is often intentional: the human intervenes on purpose because the robot is not doing the task correctly. In this article, we argue that when pHRI is intentional it is also informative: the robot can leverage interactions to learn how it should complete the rest of its current task even after the person lets go. We formalize pHRI as a dynamical system, where the human has in mind an objective function they want the robot to optimize, but the robot does not get direct access to the parameters of this objective: they are internal to the human. Within our proposed framework human interactions become observations about the true objective. We introduce approximations to learn from and respond to pHRI in real-time. We recognize that not all human corrections are perfect: often users interact with the robot noisily, and so we improve the efficiency of robot learning from pHRI by reducing unintended learning. Finally, we conduct simulations and user studies on a robotic manipulator to compare our proposed approach with the state of the art. Our results indicate that learning from pHRI leads to better task performance and improved human satisfaction.

Posted in: Applications of reinforcement learning to robots , Tagged: ,

Learning rewards from diverse human sources

July 21, 2023 09:46 ,

Bıyık E, Losey DP, Palan M, Landolfi NC, Shevchuk G, Sadigh D., Learning reward functions from diverse sources of human feedback: Optimally integrating demonstrations and preferences, . The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2022;41(1):45-67 DOI: 10.1177/02783649211041652.

Reward functions are a common way to specify the objective of a robot. As designing reward functions can be extremely challenging, a more promising approach is to directly learn reward functions from human teachers. Importantly, data from human teachers can be collected either passively or actively in a variety of forms: passive data sources include demonstrations (e.g., kinesthetic guidance), whereas preferences (e.g., comparative rankings) are actively elicited. Prior research has independently applied reward learning to these different data sources. However, there exist many domains where multiple sources are complementary and expressive. Motivated by this general problem, we present a framework to integrate multiple sources of information, which are either passively or actively collected from human users. In particular, we present an algorithm that first utilizes user demonstrations to initialize a belief about the reward function, and then actively probes the user with preference queries to zero-in on their true reward. This algorithm not only enables us combine multiple data sources, but it also informs the robot when it should leverage each type of information. Further, our approach accounts for the human’s ability to provide data: yielding user-friendly preference queries which are also theoretically optimal. Our extensive simulated experiments and user studies on a Fetch mobile manipulator demonstrate the superiority and the usability of our integrated framework..

Posted in: Applications of reinforcement learning to robots , Tagged: ,

Including a safety procedure in RL to avoid physical agent problems while learning

July 11, 2023 09:09 ,

Kim Peter Wabersich, Melanie N. Zeilinger, A predictive safety filter for learning-based control of constrained nonlinear dynamical systems, . Automatica, Volume 129, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2021.109597.

The transfer of reinforcement learning (RL) techniques into real-world applications is challenged by safety requirements in the presence of physical limitations. Most RL methods, in particular the most popular algorithms, do not support explicit consideration of state and input constraints. In this paper, we address this problem for nonlinear systems with continuous state and input spaces by introducing a predictive safety filter, which is able to turn a constrained dynamical system into an unconstrained safe system and to which any RL algorithm can be applied ‘out-of-the-box’. The predictive safety filter receives the proposed control input and decides, based on the current system state, if it can be safely applied to the real system, or if it has to be modified otherwise. Safety is thereby established by a continuously updated safety policy, which is based on a model predictive control formulation using a data-driven system model and considering state and input dependent uncertainties.

Posted in: Applications of reinforcement learning to robots , Tagged: ,

A hierarchical robot control architecture that supports learning of skills at different levels through “curriculum learning” and an interesting approach to mix behaviours

July 7, 2023 11:37 ,

Suro, F., Ferber, J., Stratulat, T. et al., A hierarchical representation of behaviour supporting open ended development and progressive learning for artificial agents, . Auton Robot 45, 245–264 (2021) DOI: 10.1007/s10514-020-09960-7.

One of the challenging aspects of open ended or lifelong agent development is that the final behaviour for which an agent is trained at a given moment can be an element for the future creation of one, or even several, behaviours of greater complexity, whose purpose cannot be anticipated. In this paper, we present modular influence network design (MIND), an artificial agent control architecture suited to open ended and cumulative learning. The MIND architecture encapsulates sub behaviours into modules and combines them into a hierarchy reflecting the modular and hierarchical nature of complex tasks. Compared to similar research, the main original aspect of MIND is the multi layered hierarchy using a generic control signal, the influence, to obtain an efficient global behaviour. This article shows the ability of MIND to learn a curriculum of independent didactic tasks of increasing complexity covering different aspects of a desired behaviour. In so doing we demonstrate the contributions of MIND to open-ended development: encapsulation into modules allows for the preservation and re-usability of all the skills acquired during the curriculum and their focused retraining, the modular structure serves the evolving topology by easing the coordination of new sensors, actuators and heterogeneous learning structures.

Posted in: Applications of reinforcement learning to robots, Developmental robotics , Tagged: ,

Discrete Q-learning used, along a Deep CNN for localization, for mobile robot navigation

July 6, 2023 11:01 ,

Amirhossein Shantia, Rik Timmers, Yiebo Chong, Cornel Kuiper, Francesco Bidoia, Lambert Schomaker, Marco Wiering, Two-stage visual navigation by deep neural networks and multi-goal reinforcement learning, . Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Volume 138, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2021.103731.

In this paper, we propose a two-stage learning framework for visual navigation in which the experience of the agent during exploration of one goal is shared to learn to navigate to other goals. We train a deep neural network for estimating the robot’s position in the environment using ground truth information provided by a classical localization and mapping approach. The second simpler multi-goal Q-function learns to traverse the environment by using the provided discretized map. Transfer learning is applied to the multi-goal Q-function from a maze structure to a 2D simulator and is finally deployed in a 3D simulator where the robot uses the estimated locations from the position estimator deep network. In the experiments, we first compare different architectures to select the best deep network for location estimation, and then compare the effects of the multi-goal reinforcement learning method to traditional reinforcement learning. The results show a significant improvement when multi-goal reinforcement learning is used. Furthermore, the results of the location estimator show that a deep network can learn and generalize in different environments using camera images with high accuracy in both position and orientation.

Posted in: Applications of reinforcement learning to robots , Tagged: , ,

Summary of the state of the art and current challenges of Deep RL in Robotics

July 3, 2023 08:43 ,

Ibarz J, Tan J, Finn C, Kalakrishnan M, Pastor P, Levine S., How to train your robot with deep reinforcement learning: lessons we have learned, . The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2021;40(4-5):698-721 DOI: 10.1177/0278364920987859.

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising approach for autonomously acquiring complex behaviors from low-level sensor observations. Although a large portion of deep RL research has focused on applications in video games and simulated control, which does not connect with the constraints of learning in real environments, deep RL has also demonstrated promise in enabling physical robots to learn complex skills in the real world. At the same time, real-world robotics provides an appealing domain for evaluating such algorithms, as it connects directly to how humans learn: as an embodied agent in the real world. Learning to perceive and move in the real world presents numerous challenges, some of which are easier to address than others, and some of which are often not considered in RL research that focuses only on simulated domains. In this review article, we present a number of case studies involving robotic deep RL. Building off of these case studies, we discuss commonly perceived challenges in deep RL and how they have been addressed in these works. We also provide an overview of other outstanding challenges, many of which are unique to the real-world robotics setting and are not often the focus of mainstream RL research. Our goal is to provide a resource both for roboticists and machine learning researchers who are interested in furthering the progress of deep RL in the real world.

NOTES:

  • Interesting summary of the state of the arts and algorithms used.
  • Defining reward beforehand partly defeats the primary goal of learning by itself.
  • Re-using experiences gathered for learning a task for other tasks, since experiences are mostly task-independent.
  • The problem of leaving the robot unattended while learning, and of mechanism damages and wear-tear. “Learning physically requires human presence for resetting experiments, monitoring hardware status and ensuring safety”. “The majority of robot learning experiments to date were conducted on a single robot closely monitored by a single human operator. This one-to-one relation between robot and operator has been a tedious but effective way to ensure continuous and safe operation. The human can reset the scene, stop the robot in unsafe situations, and simply restart and reset the robot on failures. However, to scale up data collection efforts and increase the throughput of evaluation runs, robots need to run without human supervision. It is impractical to allocate more operators to a set-up with multiple robots, or whenever a single robot is meant to run 24/7, and especially both.” “Repeated falling, self-collisions, jerky actuation, and collisions with obstacles may damage the robot and its surroundings, which will require costly repairs and manual interventions ” “We use the term robot persistence to refer to the capability of the robot to persist in collecting data and training with minimal human intervention.”
  • The Reality Gap can be very important, and so the life-long adaptation. “The reality gap is a major obstacle that prevents the application of learning to robotics”. “we found that the actuator dynamics and the lack of latency modeling are the main causes of the model error” in the reality gap. “Hardware degradation, such as change of battery level, wear and tear, and hardware failure, are the major causes of dynamic changes”
  • Recognizing dangerous situations: section 4.11.3, even learn them.
  • Importance of learning bad situations together with good situations: “to add demonstration data to the data buffer for the off-policy algorithm” -> “tends to be problematic in practice, because commonly used approximate dynamic programming methods (i.e., value function estimation) need to see both good and bad experience to learn which actions are desirable. Therefore, when the demonstrations are much better than the agent’s own experience, the value function will typically learn that the demonstrated states are better, but might fail to learn which actions must be taken to reach those states.” -> can be intertwined together, mixing their results into one (“joint training”) -> better to learn the models in model-based.
  • Simulation is needed to reduce the effort of real learning.”In the last few years, the OpenAI Gym benchmark (Brockman et al., 2016) is the key driving force behind the development of deep RL and its application to robotics”
  • “Generally speaking, among model-free techniques, off-policy methods are about an order of magnitude more data efficient than on-policy methods. Model-based methods could be another order of magnitude more data efficient than their model-free counterparts.”
  • The presence of delays in the learning loop compromises Markovianity and thus RL performance (sect. 4.8). These delays are not covered by simulators. Compensating delay techniques are addressed in sect. 4.3.1. “Latency measures the delay from when the observation is measured at the sensor, to when the action is actually executed at the actuator. This delay is usually on the order of milliseconds to seconds, depending on the hardware and the complexity of the policy. The existence of latency means that the next state of the system does not directly depend on the measured state, but instead on the state after a delay of latency after the measurement, which is not observable. Latency violates the most fundamental assumption of MDP (Xiao et al., 2020), and thus can cause failure to some RL algorithms.” ” For model-based methods, the planning component is often computationally expensive, and incurs additional latency.”
  • “pretrain a policy network with demonstrations via learning (also called behavioral cloning)”
  • Overfitting may be a cause of worsening learning quality with more experiences.
  • “effective exploration is particularly challenging in tasks with sparse reward. In the most extreme version of this problem, the agent must essentially find a (high-reward) needle in a (zero-reward) haystack. Unfortunately, the most natural formulation of many practical robotics tasks has this property. For this reason, a number of prior works have focused on studying exploration for sparse-reward robotic tasks”
  • A main drawback of Deep RL is the need of massive data.
  • High sensitivity of algorithms, particularly Deep ones, to the initial state and to the way their hyperparameters are set, specially for Off-policy algorithms.
  • “There is a tradeoff here as more environment diversity may cause the policies to have lower performance. Often this can be alleviated with larger and better neural network architectures”
Posted in: Applications of reinforcement learning to robots , Tagged: ,

Mixing Monte-Carlo Tree Search with Q-learning for robot learning

June 30, 2023 09:48 ,

Francesco Riccio, Roberto Capobianco, Daniele Nardi, LoOP: Iterative learning for optimistic planning on robots, . Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Volume 36, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2020.103693.

Efficient robotic behaviors require robustness and adaptation to dynamic changes of the environment, whose characteristics rapidly vary during robot operation. To generate effective robot action policies, planning and learning techniques have shown the most promising results. However, if considered individually, they present different limitations. Planning techniques lack generalization among similar states and require experts to define behavioral routines at different levels of abstraction. Conversely, learning methods usually require a considerable number of training samples and iterations of the algorithm. To overcome these issues, and to efficiently generate robot behaviors, we introduce LoOP, an iterative learning algorithm for optimistic planning that combines state-of-the-art planning and learning techniques to generate action policies. The main contribution of LoOP is the combination of Monte-Carlo Search Planning and Q-learning, which enables focused exploration during policy refinement in different robotic applications. We demonstrate the robustness and flexibility of LoOP in various domains and multiple robotic platforms, by validating the proposed approach with an extensive experimental evaluation.

Posted in: Applications of reinforcement learning to robots , Tagged: , ,

Deep learning RL methods for robot navigation

June 29, 2023 10:47 ,

Luong, M., Pham, C., Incremental Learning for Autonomous Navigation of Mobile Robots based on Deep Reinforcement Learning, . J Intell Robot Syst 101, 1 (2021) DOI: 10.1007/s10846-020-01262-5.

This paper presents an incremental learning method and system for autonomous robot navigation. The range finder laser sensor and online deep reinforcement learning are utilized for generating the navigation policy, which is effective for avoiding obstacles along the robot’s trajectories as well as for robot’s reaching the destination. An empirical experiment is conducted under simulation and real-world settings. Under the simulation environment, the results show that the proposed method can generate a highly effective navigation policy (more than 90% accuracy) after only 150k training iterations. Moreover, our system has slightly outperformed deep-Q, while having considerably surpassed Proximal Policy Optimization, two recent state-of-the art robot navigation systems. Finally, two experiments are performed to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of our robot’s proposed navigation system in real-time under real-world settings.

Posted in: Applications of reinforcement learning to robots , Tagged: ,

Improving the simulation-to-real transfer of learning robotic skills by learning smaller skills and how to connect them in reality

June 26, 2023 12:25 ,

Julian RC, Heiden E, He Z, et al., Scaling simulation-to-real transfer by learning a latent space of robot skills, . The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2020;39(10-11):1259-1278 DOI: 10.1177/0278364920944474.

We present a strategy for simulation-to-real transfer, which builds on recent advances in robot skill decomposition. Rather than focusing on minimizing the simulation–reality gap, we propose a method for increasing the sample efficiency and robustness of existing simulation-to-real approaches which exploits hierarchy and online adaptation. Instead of learning a unique policy for each desired robotic task, we learn a diverse set of skills and their variations, and embed those skill variations in a continuously parameterized space. We then interpolate, search, and plan in this space to find a transferable policy which solves more complex, high-level tasks by combining low-level skills and their variations. In this work, we first characterize the behavior of this learned skill space, by experimenting with several techniques for composing pre-learned latent skills. We then discuss an algorithm which allows our method to perform long-horizon tasks never seen in simulation, by intelligently sequencing short-horizon latent skills. Our algorithm adapts to unseen tasks online by repeatedly choosing new skills from the latent space, using live sensor data and simulation to predict which latent skill will perform best next in the real world. Importantly, our method learns to control a real robot in joint-space to achieve these high-level tasks with little or no on-robot time, despite the fact that the low-level policies may not be perfectly transferable from simulation to real, and that the low-level skills were not trained on any examples of high-level tasks. In addition to our results indicating a lower sample complexity for families of tasks, we believe that our method provides a promising template for combining learning-based methods with proven classical robotics algorithms such as model-predictive control.

Posted in: Applications of reinforcement learning to robots , Tagged: ,

Combination of RL with human provided models for navigation

June 26, 2023 11:58 ,

Amarildo Likmeta, Alberto Maria Metelli, Andrea Tirinzoni, Riccardo Giol, Marcello Restelli, Danilo Romano, Combining reinforcement learning with rule-based controllers for transparent and general decision-making in autonomous driving, . Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Volume 131, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2020.103568.

The design of high-level decision-making systems is a topical problem in the field of autonomous driving. In this paper, we combine traditional rule-based strategies and reinforcement learning (RL) with the goal of achieving transparency and robustness. On the one hand, the use of handcrafted rule-based controllers allows for transparency, i.e., it is always possible to determine why a given decision was made, but they struggle to scale to complex driving scenarios, in which several objectives need to be considered. On the other hand, black-box RL approaches enable us to deal with more complex scenarios, but they are usually hardly interpretable. In this paper, we combine the best properties of these two worlds by designing parametric rule-based controllers, in which interpretable rules can be provided by domain experts and their parameters are learned via RL. After illustrating how to apply parameter-based RL methods (PGPE) to this setting, we present extensive numerical simulations in the highway and in two urban scenarios: intersection and roundabout. For each scenario, we show the formalization as an RL problem and we discuss the results of our approach in comparison with handcrafted rule-based controllers and black-box RL techniques.

Posted in: Applications of reinforcement learning to robots, Robot motion planning , Tagged: