Category Archives: Psycho-physiological Bases Of Engineering

Modelling the perception of time in the human brain through RL with eligibility traces

I. Louren�o, R. Mattila, R. Ventura and B. Wahlberg, A Biologically Inspired Computational Model of Time Perception, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 258-268, June 2022 DOI: 10.1109/TCDS.2021.3120301.

Time perception\u2014how humans and animals perceive the passage of time\u2014forms the basis for important cognitive skills, such as decision making, planning, and communication. In this work, we propose a framework for examining the mechanisms responsible for time perception. We first model neural time perception as a combination of two known timing sources: internal neuronal mechanisms and external (environmental) stimuli, and design a decision-making framework to replicate them. We then implement this framework in a simulated robot. We measure the robot\u2019s success on a temporal discrimination task originally performed by mice to evaluate their capacity to exploit temporal knowledge. We conclude that the robot is able to perceive time similarly to animals when it comes to their intrinsic mechanisms of interpreting time and performing time-aware actions. Next, by analyzing the behavior of agents equipped with the framework, we propose an estimator to infer characteristics of the timing mechanisms intrinsic to the agents. In particular, we show that from their empirical action probability distribution, we are able to estimate parameters used for perceiving time. Overall, our work shows promising results when it comes to drawing conclusions regarding some of the characteristics present in biological timing mechanisms.

NOTE: See also H. Basgol, I. Ayhan and E. Ugur, “Time Perception: A Review on Psychological, Computational, and Robotic Models,” in IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 301-315, June 2022, doi: 10.1109/TCDS.2021.3059045.

Action selection strategy for model-free RL based on neurophysiology

D. Wang, S. Chen, Y. Hu, L. Liu and H. Wang, Behavior Decision of Mobile Robot With a Neurophysiologically Motivated Reinforcement Learning Model, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 219-233, March 2022 DOI: 10.1109/TCDS.2020.3035778.

Online model-free reinforcement learning (RL) approaches play a crucial role in coping with the real-world applications, such as the behavioral decision making in robotics. How to balance the exploration and exploitation processes is a central problem in RL. A balanced ratio of exploration/exploitation has a great influence on the total learning time and the quality of the learned strategy. Therefore, various action selection policies have been presented to obtain a balance between the exploration and exploitation procedures. However, these approaches are rarely, automatically, and dynamically regulated to the environment variations. One of the most amazing self-adaptation mechanisms in animals is their capacity to dynamically switch between exploration and exploitation strategies. This article proposes a novel neurophysiologically motivated model which simulates the role of medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) in behavior decision. The sensory input is transmitted to the MPFC, then the ventral tegmental area (VTA) receives a reward and calculates a dopaminergic reinforcement signal, and the feedback categorization neurons in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) calculate the vigilance according to the dopaminergic reinforcement signal. Then the vigilance is transformed to LPFC to regulate the exploration rate, finally the exploration rate is transmitted to thalamus to calculate the corresponding action probability. This action selection mechanism is introduced to the actor\u2013critic model of the basal ganglia, combining with the cerebellum model based on the developmental network to construct a new hybrid neuromodulatory model to select the action of the agent. Both the simulation comparison with other four traditional action selection policies and the physical experiment results demonstrate the potential of the proposed neuromodulatory model in action selection.

The brain as a communication network

John D. Mollon, Chie Takahashi, Marina V. Danilova, What kind of network is the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 26, Issue 4, 2022, Pages 312-324 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.01.007.

The different areas of the cerebral cortex are linked by a network of white matter, comprising the myelinated axons of pyramidal cells. Is this network a neural net, in the sense that representations of the world are embodied in the structure of the net, its pattern of nodes, and connections? Or is it a communications network, where the same physical substrate carries different information from moment to moment? This question is part of the larger question of whether the brain is better modeled by connectionism or by symbolic artificial intelligence (AI), but we review it in the specific context of the psychophysics of stimulus comparison and the format and protocol of information transmission over the long-range tracts of the brain.

An hypothesis that human perception can only be done in real-time if prediction mechanisms go ahead and save the gap caused by the processing of inputs, which actually cannot be done in real-time (plus further post-processing and adjustment of past perceptions)

Hinze Hogendoorn, Perception in real-time: predicting the present, reconstructing the past, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 26, Issue 2, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.11.003.

We feel that we perceive events in the environment as they unfold in real-time. However, this intuitive view of perception is impossible to implement in the nervous system due to biological constraints such as neural transmission delays. I propose a new way of thinking about real-time perception: at any given moment, instead of representing a single timepoint, perceptual mechanisms represent an entire timeline. On this timeline, predictive mechanisms predict ahead to compensate for delays in incoming sensory input, and reconstruction mechanisms retroactively revise perception when those predictions do not come true. This proposal integrates and extends previous work to address a crucial gap in our understanding of a fundamental aspect of our everyday life: the experience of perceiving the present.

Defining and measuring mathematically the level of knowledge, ignorance and uncertainty

Fujun Hou, Evangelos Triantaphyllou, Juri Yanase, Knowledge, ignorance, and uncertainty: An investigation from the perspective of some differential equations, Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 191, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116325.

People use knowledge on several cognitive tasks such as when they recognize objects, rank entities such as the alternatives in multi-criteria decision making, or for classification tasks of decision making / expert / intelligent systems. When people have sufficient relevant knowledge, they can make well-distinctive assessments among entities. Otherwise, they may exhibit some uncertainty. This paper establishes two differential equations, of which one is for the interaction between the knowledge level and the uncertainty level, and the other is for the interaction between the ignorance level and the uncertainty level. By solving these two differential equations under certain boundary conditions, one can derive that the proposed knowledge level indicator is equivalent to Wierman’s knowledge granularity measure up to a constant (exactly, ln2). Moreover, the knowledge level indicator and the ignorance level indicator are found to be in a complementary relationship with each other. That is, more knowledge implies less ignorance, and vice-versa. The results of this study bridge a critical gap that exists in the understanding of the concepts of knowledge and ignorance.

On how the exploitation-exploration dicotomy shifts to exploitation as humans get older

R. Nathan Spreng, Gary R. Turner, From exploration to exploitation: a shifting mental mode in late life development, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 25, Issue 12, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.09.0010.

Changes in cognition, affect, and brain function combine to promote a shift in the nature of mentation in older adulthood, favoring exploitation of prior knowledge over exploratory search as the starting point for thought and action. Age-related exploitation biases result from the accumulation of prior knowledge, reduced cognitive control, and a shift toward affective goals. These are accompanied by changes in cortical networks, as well as attention and reward circuits. By incorporating these factors into a unified account, the exploration-to-exploitation shift offers an integrative model of cognitive, affective, and brain aging. Here, we review evidence for this model, identify determinants and consequences, and survey the challenges and opportunities posed by an exploitation-biased mental mode in later life.

On how physical movements shape the perception of time

Rose De Kock, Keri Anne Gladhill, Minaz Numa Ali, Wilsaan Mychal Joiner, Martin Wiener, How movements shape the perception of time, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 25, Issue 11, 2021, Pages 950-963 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.08.002.

In order to keep up with a changing environment, mobile organisms must be capable of deciding both where and when to move. This precision necessitates a strong sense of time, as otherwise we would fail in many of our movement goals. Yet, despite this intrinsic link, only recently have researchers begun to understand how these two features interact. Primarily, two effects have been observed: movements can bias time estimates, but they can also make them more precise. Here we review this literature and propose that both effects can be explained by a Bayesian cue combination framework, in which movement itself affords the most precise representation of time, which can influence perception in either feedforward or active sensing modes.

Solving the “self-recognition on a mirror” problem for robots

Arianna Pipitone, Antonio Chella, Robot passes the mirror test by inner speech, . Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Volume 144, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2021.103838.

The mirror test is a well-known task in Robotics. The existing strategies are based on kinesthetic-visual matching techniques and manipulate perceptual and motion data. The proposed work attempts to demonstrate that it is possible to implement a robust robotic self-recognition method by the inner speech, i.e. the self-dialogue that enables reasoning on symbolic information. The robot self-talks and conceptually reasons on the symbolic forms of signals, and infers if the robot it sees in the mirror is itself or not. The idea is supported by the existing literature in psychology, where the importance of inner speech in self-reflection and self-concept emergence for solving the mirror test was empirically demonstrated.

Trying to reach general AI through just decision-making (rewards) instead of using a diversity of paradigms

avid Silver, Satinder Singh, Doina Precup, Richard S. Sutton, Reward is enough, . Artificial Intelligence, Volume 299, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2021.103535.

In this article we hypothesise that intelligence, and its associated abilities, can be understood as subserving the maximisation of reward. Accordingly, reward is enough to drive behaviour that exhibits abilities studied in natural and artificial intelligence, including knowledge, learning, perception, social intelligence, language, generalisation and imitation. This is in contrast to the view that specialised problem formulations are needed for each ability, based on other signals or objectives. Furthermore, we suggest that agents that learn through trial and error experience to maximise reward could learn behaviour that exhibits most if not all of these abilities, and therefore that powerful reinforcement learning agents could constitute a solution to artificial general intelligence.

NOTES:

  • The computational and physical limitations of the agent to cope with a too complex world is the main reason to use learning instead of pre-built knowledge (evolution): it allows the agent to focus on acquiring skills for its own circumstances first, that are the most important for it.
  • Argument why classification (supervised learning) is less powerful and efficient than RL.
  • Same with multi-agent settings vs. one agent confronted with a single complex environment (containing other agents).

A nice survey on active learning, in particular for robotics

Annalisa T. Taylor, Thomas A. Berrueta, Todd D. Murphey, Active learning in robotics: A review of control principles, . Mechatronics, Volume 77, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2021.102576.

Active learning is a decision-making process. In both abstract and physical settings, active learning demands
both analysis and action. This is a review of active learning in robotics, focusing on methods amenable to
the demands of embodied learning systems. Robots must be able to learn efficiently and flexibly through
continuous online deployment. This poses a distinct set of control-oriented challenges??one must choose
suitable measures as objectives, synthesize real-time control, and produce analyses that guarantee performance
and safety with limited knowledge of the environment or robot itself. In this work, we survey the fundamental
components of robotic active learning systems. We discuss classes of learning tasks that robots typically
encounter, measures with which they gauge the information content of observations, and algorithms for
generating action plans. Moreover, we provide a variety of examples ?? from environmental mapping to
nonparametric shape estimation ?? that highlight the qualitative differences between learning tasks, information
measures, and control techniques. We conclude with a discussion of control-oriented open challenges, including
safety-constrained learning and distributed learning.

NOTES:

  • RL can be considered one of the areas within computational learning theory, that usually ignore physical embodiment aspects of the learning agent. However, that is only so when RL explores through decision-making, not when it explores randomly, without much purpose of enhancing learning itself through its actions.
  • RL caveats (particularly Deep RL): their large data requirements, lack of generalizability between tasks, as well as their inability to learn incrementally and guarantee
    safety.
  • Bayesian filters can be seen as learner systems: they learn parameters of objects (pose) or environments (maps) aided by some models. However, they are more active learners when they use the robot actions to improve that parameter learning.
  • Gaussian processes can be effective in learning those models when no parameterical form is available or much first-principle knowledge, for instance, when the robot has to learn the model only observing a small part of the environment (local).
  • Entropy/information, Fisher’s information (conditional information) and ergodicity are the main ways of measuring information gain in active learning.